In response to China's Intellectual Property Office is not to imitate cottage culture of innovation

April 23 news sites, according to China Intellectual Property Office, China Intellectual Property Office Tian Lipu, the "protection of intellectual property rights in China in 2008 the situation of the press conference", the first "cottage culture" to respond to that part of mobile phone firms are suspected of infringing intellectual property rights of others, imitation, copying is not innovation.

 

                China's State Intellectual Property Office Tian Lipu

Tian Lipu said recently, "cottage culture" speculation very hot, want to raise two points in this regard: on the one hand, China is a rule of law in the field of intellectual property we have a sound system of law, any manufacturer, the market launch of the product must be in compliance with Chinese laws, including intellectual property laws. I saw a recent research report written by his mobile phone firms devoted to an analysis of the situation, the report noted that a considerable number of mobile phone firms have been suspected of infringement of one another's design patent and trademark rights. So I think this phenomenon certainly is not worth doing anything, even a propaganda and cheered, because they are already suspected of violating the law, has been arrested for violations of intellectual property rights of others, it is necessary to know that copying and copying is not innovation, and for this reason I think we should have a clear position and attitude.




On the other hand, I think that if an enterprise, whether it is in the cottage in the village, or in the plains, it produced a product, the product embodies the creativity and innovation, but also good quality and more features, does not infringe the rights of others At the same time, consumers will be able to accept again the price of the market and I think this is positive, in fact, this is one way of innovation. So from the perspective of intellectual property rights, we analyze the "cottage culture", "cottage phenomenon", we can draw such a conclusion: We all have praised the innovative and encourage any violation of the rights of others we do not support, does not support.